User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_7; xx) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/530.17; 360 Aphone Browser (6.8.5)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-360.yaml
Qihoo 360 Browser 6.8.5Android Webkit 530.17mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 4.0WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 4.0closeOS X 10.5.7desktop-browsercloseclose0.205 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
360 Phone Browser 6.8WebKit Mac 10.5desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeOS X 10.5.7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeMac OS X 10.5.7closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4.0closeOS X 10.5.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 4.0WebKit 530.17Mac OS X 10.5.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qihoo 360 Browser 6.8.5Webkit 530.17Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:33 | by ThaDafinser