User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; ru-ru; FLY IQ256 Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1 Maxthon/4.1.4.2000
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
Maxthon 4.1.4.2000Android 2.3.6WebKit FlyIQ256smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon 4.1WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6FlyIQ256mobile-browseryescloseclose0.256 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Maxthon 4.1WebKit Android 2.3FlyIQ256smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Maxthon 4.1.4closeAndroid 2.3.6FlyIQ256closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maxthon 4.1.4.2000closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Maxthon 4.1.4.2000WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.422 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon 4.1.4Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6FlyIQ256 Voguemobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3FlyIQ256Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.174 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:33 | by ThaDafinser