User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.23; Macintosh; PPC) Escape 5.1.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Espial TV Browser 5.1.8Mac tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 4.0Tasman MacPPC AppleMacintoshDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.23closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Espial TV Browser 5.1.8closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Espial TV Browser 5.1 Mac tv0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.23close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.23close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Escape 5.1.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0.116 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.23Trident Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.2.3 closeclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.23closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:32 | by ThaDafinser