User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (PlayStation Vita 3.00) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/sony.yaml
3.00Webkit 536.26SonyPlaystation Vitagaming:portableyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Sony Playstation Vita WebKit JAVA SonyPlaystation VitaConsoleyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Browser 3.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Apple Mail closeLiveArea email-clientcloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront WebKit PlayStation Portable VitaSonyPlayStation Vitaconsoleyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront NX close SonyPlayStation Vitacloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0NetFront 536.26LiveArea 3.00SonyPlayStation Vitacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 536.26 3.00SonyPlaystation Vitagaming:portableyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
PlayStation Vita closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyPlayStation VitaOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:32 | by ThaDafinser