User agent detail

SkyNet/1.5.0-0000(android:2.3.5;package:com.halfbrick.jetpackjoyride;lang:zh_CN;app_version:null;channel:;device_brand:htc_europe;device_model:HTC Rhyme S510b;resolution:480X800;udid:ffffffff-aec2-e97e-399d-229600000000;cpu_freq:1024000;google_account:berndschaefer40@gmail.com;phone_number:unknown;game_name:Jetpack+Joyride;encoded:true;sdk_version:1.5.0;imei:358071040793175;location:unknown)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCRhyme S510b Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
version nullcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCeuropemobile-browseryescloseclose0.231 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android HTCeuropesmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCRhyme S510bcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser Android HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCeuropemobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:32 | by ThaDafinser