User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; AirTab_ES70 Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.102 YaBrowser/14.2.1700.12535.01 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DNSAirTab ES70 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 14.2Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 14.2.1700.12535.01closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.294 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 14.2Blink Android 4.1yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 14.2.1700.12535.01closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 14.2.1700closeAndroid 4.1.1DNSAirTab ES70closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.176 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 14.2.1700.12535.1WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.418 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 14.2Blink Android 4.1.1AirTab_ES70tabletyescloseclose0.10201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:31 | by ThaDafinser