User agent detail

Lenovo-A788t_TD/S100 Linux/3.4.39 Android/4.3 Release/08.15.2013 Browser/AppleWebkit534.30 Mobile Safari/534.30; 360browser(securitypay,securityinstalled); 360(android,uppayplugin); 360 Aphone Browser (1.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-360.yaml
Qihoo 360 Browser 1.0Android 4.3Webkit 534.30LenovoA788mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Qihoo 360 Browser 1.0closeAndroid 4.3LenovoA788mobile-browseryescloseclose0.266 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
360 Phone Browser 1.0WebKit Android 4.3LenovoA788tsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeAndroid 4.3LenovoA788t_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeandroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qihoo 360 Browser 1.0Webkit 534.30Android 4.3LenovoA788mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
360 Browser closeAndroid 4.3LenovoA788tSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:31 | by ThaDafinser