User agent detail

Huawei-U2800/U2800ACBXB119 Browser/Obigo-Browser/Q05A
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-obigo.yaml
Obigo Q 5A HuaweiU2800mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.068 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Huawei-U2800 U2800ACBXB119closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 5close HuaweiU2800mobile-browseryescloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo HuaweiU2800smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A HuaweiU2800mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
emobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo close HuaweiU2800Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:31 | by ThaDafinser