User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (en-us) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google PP Default) Chrome/27.0.1453 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
Chrome 27.0unknown unknownunknown unknowngeneral DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 27.0WebKit Desktop0.067 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453close desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 27.0WebKit 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453close closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 27.0.1453close closecloseclosecloseclose0.117 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453WebKit 537.36 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 27Blink desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 27.0.1453closeMac OS X 10.7.3Desktopcloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:31 | by ThaDafinser