User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; En-us; Spice_Mi300 Build/DONUT) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, Like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SpiceMi300 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android 1.6Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6GenericAndroid 1.6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 1.6SpiceMi300smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 1.6closeAndroid 1.6SpiceMi300closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 1.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 3.1.2WebKit 528.5Android 1.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.463 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 528.5Android 1.6SpiceMi-300mobile:smartyescloseclose0.043 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 1.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:30 | by ThaDafinser