User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.1; Windows NT)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
yesFake IEBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake IEBot/Crawler0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.1closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.1Trident Windows NTdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.1closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.1closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.1closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.1Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.1 Windows desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:30 | by ThaDafinser