User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Unix) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.77 Safari/535.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-unix.yaml
Chrome 16Unix Webkit 535.7desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 16.0WebKit 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 16.0.912.77close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 16.0.912close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeUnix closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 16.0.912.77WebKit 535.7 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 16Webkit 535.7Unix desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 16.0.912.77closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:30 | by ThaDafinser