User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; G Watch R Build/LCA44B) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.157 Crosswalk/15.44.384.12 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/watch/os-android-wear.yaml
Crosswalk WebView 15Android Wear Blink 537.36LGG Watch Rwatchyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 44.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.103 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.157closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.157closeAndroid 5.1.1GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.254 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 44.0Blink Android 5.1tabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.157closeChrome OS 44.0.2403.157closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 44.0.2403closeAndroid 5.1.1G Watch Rcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.157WebKit 537.36Android 5.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Crosswalk WebView 15Blink Android Wear LGG Watch Rwatchyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.157closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.069 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:29 | by ThaDafinser