User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; en-us; E-TAB IVORY Build/E702) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-697.php
Android 4.0Android 4.1unknown LavaE-Tab IVORYTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1LavaE-Tab IVORYTabletyesyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.285 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2E-TAB IVORYcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.2E-TAB IVORYtabletyescloseclose0.08901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:29 | by ThaDafinser