User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; AP-106 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.74 Safari/537.36 OPR/28.0.1764.89981
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mobile 28.0Android 4.2unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 28.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.096 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 28.0.1764.89981closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 28.0.1764.89981closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.308 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 28.0Blink Android 4.2yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 28.0.1764.89981closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 28.0.1764closeAndroid 4.2.2AssistantAP-106closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 28.0.1764.89981WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.564 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 28.0Blink Android 4.2.2AP-106tabletyescloseclose0.11401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 28.0.1764.89981closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:29 | by ThaDafinser