User agent detail

Opera/9.27 (Windows NT 5.1; U; de)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Opera 9.27Windows XPPresto desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.27Presto 2.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.27closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.27closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.27Presto Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.27closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.27closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.27closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.27 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.27 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.27closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:29 | by ThaDafinser