User agent detail

Mozilla/3.04Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.1-RELEASE i386)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Netscape Navigator 3.0.4FreeBSD 2.2.1 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 3.0.4closeFreeBSD 2.2.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
FreeBSD 2.2desktop0.022 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 3.04GoldcloseFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeFreeBSD 2.2.1closeclosecloseclose0.02 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 3 Gold 3.04Gold FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Navigator 3.0.4 FreeBSD 2.2.1desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Japan Radio CompanyWX330JFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:29 | by ThaDafinser