User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.77 Large Screen Safari/534.24 GoogleTV/000000
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
GoogleTV Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 11.0WebKit Linux GoogleGoogleTVTV Device0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.22 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 11.0WebKit Google TV GoogleGoogleTVtvyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 11.0.696closeGoogleTV GoogleTVcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 11.0.696.77WebKit 534.24Google TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 11Webkit 534.24Google TV televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux i686 GoogleTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:28 | by ThaDafinser