User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Android; Opera Mini/26.0.1656/35.6497; U; de) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Opera Mini 26.0Android unknown2.8 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 26.0Presto 2.8Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 26.0.1656closeAndroid OperaMini 5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 26.0Presto Android yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 26.0.1656closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 26.0.1656closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 26.0.1656closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 26.0.1656Presto 2.8.119Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.545 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 26.0Presto 2.8.119Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6close OperaMini 5Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:28 | by ThaDafinser