User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; ImPAD6213M_v2 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.154 YaBrowser/14.4.1750.13427.00 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ImpressionImPAD 6213M_v2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 14.4Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.076 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.154closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 14.4.1750.13427.00closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.256 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 14.4Blink Android 4.1yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 14.4.1750.13427.00closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 14.4.1750closeAndroid 4.1.2ImpressionImPAD 6213M_v2closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 14.4.1750.13427.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 14.4Blink Android 4.1.2ImpressionImPAD 6213Mtabletyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.154closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.052 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:28 | by ThaDafinser