User agent detail

BREW-Applet/0x20068888 (BREW/3.1.5.20; DeviceId: 90197; Lang: zhcn) ucweb-squid
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-brew.yaml
UC Browser Brew 3.1.5.20Gecko mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesSquidBot/Crawler0.071 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
BREW-Applet 0x20068888closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser Brew 3.1yes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeBREW 3.1.5closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.083 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Gecko Brew 3.1.5.20mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:28 | by ThaDafinser