User agent detail

PANTECH-P7000/JDUS10052009; Mozilla/5.0 (Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1; Opera Mini/att/4.2.15645; U; fr) Opera 9.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
Opera Mini 4.2.15645 Presto PantechP7000smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 4.2Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.057 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.50close desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 4.2Presto PantechP7000smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini attclose closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 4.2.15645close PantechP7000closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini close closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 4.2 PantechImpactmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close PantechP7000Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:27 | by ThaDafinser