User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Vodafone/1.0/LG-KC910/V08h Browser/Teleca-Q7.1 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Teleca Browser Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.167 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM LGKC910mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LGKC910smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGKC910closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo Q7.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0 LGLGKC910closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7.1 LGKC910mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile LG-KC910closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGKC910Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:27 | by ThaDafinser