User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; PMID70C Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.64 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PolaroidPMID70C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.094 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.0.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.268 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.0PolaroidPMID70Ctabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.0.3PolaroidPMID70Ccloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.64WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.64Blink Android 4.0.3PolaroidPMID 70ctabletyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.071 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:26 | by ThaDafinser