User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; QQDownload 691; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; MALC)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Internet Explorer 8.0Windows 7Trident Lenovodesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 8.0Trident 4.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 7.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows 7Lenovodesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 7.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.112 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQDownload Download Manager 691Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 6.1Lenovocloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.369 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:26 | by ThaDafinser