User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S5260P/S5260PXXKF2 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/2.0 NexPlayer/3.0 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5260P Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0Mobile Deviceyes0.056 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S5260P S5260PXXKF2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0close SamsungGT-S5260Pmobile-browseryescloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NexPlayer 3.0 SamsungGT-S5260Psmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0close SamsungGT-S5260Pcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0 Touchwiz 3.0SamsungPlayer Citymobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT-S5260PFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:26 | by ThaDafinser