User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; MX Enjoy TV BOX Build/V1.03.04MX01_20130805) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.96 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 41.0Android 4.1unknown GeniatechMX Enjoy TV BOXTV Device Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.1GeniatechMX Enjoy TV BOXTV Device0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.251 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.1tabletyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeAndroid 4.1.2MX Enjoy TV BOXcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.96WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Android 4.1.2GeniatechEnjoy TVtelevisioncloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:26 | by ThaDafinser