User agent detail

LGE-AX5450 UP.Browser/4.1.27
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGAX5450 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGAX5450Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LGE-AX5450 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.27close LGAX5450mobile-browseryescloseclose0.206 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGAX5450smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.27close LGAX5450closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.27 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 LGAX5450mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGAX5450Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:25 | by ThaDafinser