User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (NokiaE52-1)UC AppleWebkit(like Gecko) Safari/530
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaE52-1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.066 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 530closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeSeries60 NokiaE52mobile-browseryescloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian NokiaE52-1smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 530closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 52close NokiaE52-1closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit NokiaOS NokiaNokia E52-1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Gecko Series60 NokiaE52mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:25 | by ThaDafinser