User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-047.php
Firefox 26.0WinXP 5.126.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 26.0Gecko 26.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 26.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 26.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.178 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 26.0Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 26.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 26.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 26.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 26.0Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 26.0Gecko 26.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 26.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:25 | by ThaDafinser