User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; En-US; IRIS355 Build/IRIS355) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, Like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/8.7.0.315 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LavaIris 355 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.149 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.251 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 2.3LavaIris 355smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0closeAndroid 2.3.6LavaIris 355closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 355closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.0.315WebKit 528.5Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Webkit 528.5Android 2.3.6LavaIris 355mobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:25 | by ThaDafinser