User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 2.3.7; xx; MB501; 320*480) UCWEB8.7.4.225/145/999
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 8.7Android 2.3.7 MotorolaCLIQ XTmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.338 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7 GNU/Linux desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.4closeAndroid 2.3.7closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 8.7.4.225closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.4.225 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7 Android 2.3.7MotorolaCLIQ XTmobile:smartyescloseclose0.06601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:24 | by ThaDafinser