User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Spotify/1.0.4.90 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Spotify 1.0.4 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.36closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 537.36closeOS X 10.7.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac 10.7desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Spotify 1.0.4closeMac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 537.36OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:23 | by ThaDafinser