User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia305/03.60; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40Ov
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia305 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 NokiaAsha 305mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia305smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 03.60;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 305closeNokia Series 40 Nokia305closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 305closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.567 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko Series40 NokiaAsha 305mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:23 | by ThaDafinser