User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 2.0.0.20Windows 2000Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.115 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0.0.20closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 2.0.0.20closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.0Gecko Windows 2000desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.0.0.20closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 2.0.0closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.0.0.20closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.0.0.20Gecko 20081217Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.418 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 2.0.0.20Gecko 1.8.1Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0.0.20closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:23 | by ThaDafinser