User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; BRAVIA 2015 Build/LGZ23.S49) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.101 Safari/537.36 OPR/28.0.1754.0 OMI/4.4.22.20.E102586-1.98
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 4.4Android TV Blink 537.36SonyBravia Android TV (2015)television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 28.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.161 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 28.0.1754.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 28.0.1754.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.251 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 28.0Blink GNU/Linux LGZ23smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 28.0.1754.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 28.0.1754closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.101closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.165 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 28.0.1754.0WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 4.4Blink Android TV SonyBravia Android TV (2015)televisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 28.0.1754.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 28.0.1750.31closeMac OS X 10.10.1Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:23 | by ThaDafinser