User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-US; ROERPAD Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.4.1.565 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 10.4Android 4.2unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.4U3 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.098 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.277 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.4WebKit Android 4.2yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.4.1closeAndroid 4.2.2ROERPADcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.4.1.565WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.4Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2ROERPADmobile:smartyescloseclose0.08901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:22 | by ThaDafinser