User agent detail

samsung-gt-s3650c/UCWEB8.0.3.99/69/999 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsunggt-s3650c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
samsung-gt-s3650c UCWEB8.0.3.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.249 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.0 Samsunggt-s3650csmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.0.3close Samsunggt-s3650ccloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 8.0.3.99close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.0.3.99 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.0Gecko Touchwiz SamsungCorbymobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:21 | by ThaDafinser