User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko Firefox/11.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
Firefox 11.0WinXP 5.111.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 11.0Gecko 11.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 11.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 11.0Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 11.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 11.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 11.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 11.0Gecko Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 11.0Gecko 11.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 11.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 11.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:21 | by ThaDafinser