User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/534.50 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Instapaper/4.0 (+http://www.instapaper.com/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
UNKNOWN Mac OSX pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.1WebKit MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.6desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X 10.6.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeMac OS X 10.6.8closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1closeOS X 10.6.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.50Mac OS X 10.6.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:21 | by ThaDafinser