User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.3; HM 1S Build/JLS36C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916.141Android 4.3Blink XiaomiHM 1Ssmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.3XiaomiHM 1Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.34803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.3XiaomiHM 1Ssmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.3XiaoMiHM 1Scloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.29103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141WebKit 537.36Android 4.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.3XiaomiRedmi 1Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.3XiaomiHM 1SSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:20 | by ThaDafinser