User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux i686; Opera Mobi/2; MeeGo; U; xx) Presto/2.10.254 Version/12.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-meego.yaml
Opera Mobile 12.00MeeGo Presto 2.10.254mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.00Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 12.00closeLinux OperaOpera for Series 60mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 12.00Presto MeeGo yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 12.0closeMeeGo closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 12.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.0Presto 2.10.254Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 12.00Presto 2.10.254MeeGo mobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close LGVN270Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:19 | by ThaDafinser