User agent detail

iBrowser/Mini2.5 (Nokia6303iclassic/10.80)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-ibrowser.yaml
iBrowser Mini 2.5Series40 Nokia6303i classicmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
iBrowser 2.5WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
iBrowser Mini2.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IBrowse Symbian Nokia6303iclassicsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 10.80)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
iBrowser Mini 2.5close Nokia6303iclassiccloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6303iclassiccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iBrowser Mini 2.5 Series40 Nokia6303i classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:19 | by ThaDafinser