User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 2.3.5; MITO_A78 Build/GINGERBREAD) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.64336
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MitoA78 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.64336closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212.64336closeAndroid 2.3.5GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 2.3yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64336closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212closeAndroid 2.3.5MitoA78closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1212.64336WebKit 537.36Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46505 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 2.3.5HargaMITO A78mobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64336closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:19 | by ThaDafinser