User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Firefox 16.0WinVista 6.016.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 16.0Gecko 16.0WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.053 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 16.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 16.0closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 16.0Gecko Windows Vistadesktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 16.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 16.0closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 16.0closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 16.0Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 16.0Gecko 16.0Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 16.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 16.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:18 | by ThaDafinser