User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; PL; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows ME Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.7Gecko 1.7WinME MEWindows DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.7.5closeWindows 4.90desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows MEdesktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.7close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows ME closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.7.5closeWindows Me closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.7.5Gecko 20041217Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.7.5Windows MEdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:18 | by ThaDafinser