User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; ru; DIGMA iDsD8 3G Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.8.0.435 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.8Android 4.1unknown DigmaiDsD8 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.8U3 Android 4.1DigmaiDsD8 3GTabletyesyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1DigmaiDsD8 3Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.8WebKit Android 4.1yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.8.0closeAndroid 4.1.1DIGMA iDsD8 3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.8.0.435WebKit 533.1Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.8Webkit 533.1Android 4.1.1DigmaiDsD8tabletyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:18 | by ThaDafinser