User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 2.2.2; zh-cn; HUAWEI-U9000; 480*800) UCWEB7.9.4.145/139/32109
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiU9000 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 GNU/Linux HuaweiU9000smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.4closeAndroid 2.2.2HuaweiU9000closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.4.145closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.4.145 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9 Android 2.2.2HuaweiAscend Xmobile:smartyescloseclose0.042 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:18 | by ThaDafinser