User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.99; Build/MPZ44Q) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.63 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
Chrome 44Android MBlink 537.36mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 44.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.064 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.63closeAndroid 5.1.99LGP880mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 44.0Blink Android 5.1smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.63closeAndroid 5.1.99closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403closeAndroid 5.1.99closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1.99closecloseclosecloseclose0.09401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.63WebKit 537.36Android 5.1.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44105 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 44Blink Android Mmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.63closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:17 | by ThaDafinser