User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; OV-SteelCore-B Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 38.0Android 4.1unknown OvermaxSteelCoreTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.1OvermaxSteelCoreTabletyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.34203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.1OvermaxOV-SteelCore-Btabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeAndroid 4.1.1OV-SteelCore-Bcloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Android 4.1.1OV-SteelCore-Btabletyescloseclose0.11901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:17 | by ThaDafinser